Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSBMR

JBM : Journal of Bone Metabolism

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Page Path

6
results for

"Meta-analysis"

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

Funded articles

"Meta-analysis"

Original Articles

Impact of Bone Graft Type on Spinal Fusion Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Updated Meta-Analysis
Eunseo Joung, Ki-Tae Park, Naye Kang, Suyeon Park, Nah Yon Kim, Young Hak Roh, Byung-Ho Yoon
J Bone Metab 2025;32(4):331-343.
Published online November 30, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.25.889
Background
Posterior spinal fusion is performed for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), with bone graft playing a critical role in achieving solid fusion. Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) is the gold standard but has donor site morbidity, leading to increased use of non-ICBG. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of ICBG and non-ICBG bone grafts in AIS.
Methods
This meta-analysis included 23 studies with 3,350 patients, categorized into ICBG and non-ICBG groups. The primary outcome was fusion rate; secondary outcomes were implant-related complication rate, infection rate, donor site pain, blood loss, and operation time. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted to estimate binary outcomes, and a weighted mean model was used to estimate continuous variables.
Results
The fusion rate was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93-99) in ICBG group and 97% (95% CI, 95-98) in non-ICBG group. Implant-related complications occurred in 5% (95% CI, 3-7) and 4% (95% CI, 2-6) of each group, while surgical site infections occurred in 3% (95% CI, 2-7) and 2% (95% CI, 1-3). Donor site pain was observed exclusively in ICBG group, with a prevalence of 49% (95% CI, 3–97). Estimated pooled blood loss was 1,461.10 mL (95% CI, 545.30-2,376.90) in ICBG group and 1,047.45 mL (95% CI, 666.92-1,427.99) in non-ICBG group. The estimated pooled operation time was 246.77 (95% CI, 221.74-271.80) and 232.37 (95% CI, 194.88-269.86) for each group.
Conclusions
Considering both ICBG and non-ICBG demonstrated high fusion rates and low complication rates, non-ICBG grafts may serve as an effective and safe alternative to ICBG, minimizing morbidity, donor site pain, and blood loss.
  • 1,842 View
  • 32 Download
Discriminatory Accuracy of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Asian Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Dheeraj Jha, Manju Chandran, Namki Hong, Yumie Rhee, Seungjin Baek, Stephen J. Ferguson, Benedikt Helgason, Anitha D. Praveen
J Bone Metab 2024;31(4):296-315.
Published online November 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.24.781
Background
This review explores the discriminative ability of fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) in major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) risk prediction and the densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis in Asian populations.
Methods
We systematically searched the EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases from the earliest indexing date to January 2024. Studies were included if FRAX was used to identify future osteoporotic fractures or a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis in an Asian population and reported the area under the curve (AUC) values. Meta-analyses were conducted after quality assessment for AUC with 95% confidence intervals across the following categories: standard FRAX without/with bone mineral density (BMD), adjusted FRAX, and BMD alone for fracture prediction, as well as standard FRAX for densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Results
A total of 42 studies were included. The AUC values for predicting fracture risk using FRAX-MOF with BMD (0.73 [0.70–0.77]) was highest compared to FRAX-MOF without BMD (0.72 [0.66–0.77]), and adjusted FRAX-MOF (0.71 [0.65–0.77]). The AUC values for predicting fracture risk using FRAX-HF with BMD (0.77 [0.71–0.83]) was highest compared to FRAX-HF without BMD (0.72 [0.65–0.80]), and adjusted FRAX-HF (0.75 [0.63–0.86]). The AUC values for BMD alone (0.68 [0.62–0.73]) was lowest for fracture prediction. The AUC values for identifying a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis was 0.77 [0.70–0.84] and 0.76 [0.67-0.86] using FRAX-MOF and FRAX-HF, respectively.
Conclusions
FRAX with BMD tends to perform more reliably in predicting HF compared to MOF in Asia. However, its accuracy in predicting fracture risk in Asian populations can be improved through region-specific, long-term epidemiological data.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • 1. DXA-derived biofidelic finite element models for quantifying the efficacy of hip protectors
    Dheeraj Jha, Yijun Zhou, Anitha D Praveen, Ellie S Galliker, Preeti Gupta, Ecosse L Lamoureux, Namki Hong, Yumie Rhee, Halldór Pálsson, Stephen J Ferguson, Benedikt Helgason
    JBMR Plus.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 2. Health outcomes and care needs after osteoporotic fractures in rural Chinese older adults: policy implications
    Qian Zhu, Caixia Ran
    Frontiers in Public Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3. Relationship between areal BMD, FRAX®, and femoral strength in community-dwelling older Asian adults
    Dheeraj Jha, Manju Chandran, Dario Koller, Vee San Cheong, Anitha D. Praveen, Alexander Baker, Preeti Gupta, Ecosse L. Lamoureux, Halldór Pálsson, Stephen J. Ferguson, Benedikt Helgason
    Archives of Osteoporosis.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4. Development of a machine learning-based predictive model for osteoporosis risk and its application in clinical decision support
    Zichen Shao, Jianfeng Wu, Qinqin Deng, Ling Cheng, Xin Huang, Weikang Sun, Weidong Liang, Huanan Li
    Frontiers in Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 5. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry based biofidelic finite element models for simulating falls to the hip: Impact of trochanteric soft tissue thickness on fracture risk
    Dheeraj Jha, Anitha D. Praveen, Alexander Baker, Anita Fung, Vee San Cheong, Preeti Gupta, Ecosse L. Lamoureux, Namki Hong, Yumie Rhee, Vanessa Jean Wen Koh, Halldór Pálsson, William R. Taylor, Angelique Wei-Ming Chan, Stephen J. Ferguson, Benedikt Helgas
    Clinical Biomechanics.2025; : 106720.     CrossRef
  • 6. Osteoporosis in men—East and West: Can the twain meet? A perspective from Asia
    Gerald Gui Ren Sng, Jean-Yves Reginster, Majed S. Alokail, Manju Chandran
    Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia.2024; 10(4): 131.     CrossRef
  • 6,134 View
  • 87 Download
  • Crossref
A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Osteoporotic Fracture among Different Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Dibbendhu Khanra, Anindya Mukherjee, Saurabh Deshpande, Hassan Khan, Sanjeev Kathuria, Danesh Kella, Deepak Padmanabhan
J Bone Metab 2021;28(2):139-150.
Published online May 31, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2021.28.2.139
Background
There are limited studies comparing the risk of osteoporosis and fractures between different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Using a network meta-analysis (NMA), we compared osteoporotic fractures among 5 different treatment arms, viz. dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and VKA.
Methods
Ten studies, including 5 randomized control trials and 5 population-based studies, with a total of 321,844 patients (148,751 and 173,093 in the VKA and DOAC group, respectively) with a median follow-up of 2 years, were included. A Bayesian random-effects NMA model comparing fractures among the treatment arms was performed using MetInsight V3. Sensitivity analysis excluded studies with the highest residual deviances from the NMA model.
Results
The mean age of the patients was 70 years. The meta-analysis favored DOACs over VKA with significantly lower osteoporotic fracture (odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.70-0.86). The NMA demonstrated that fractures were significantly lower with apixaban compared with dabigatran (OR, 0.64; 95% CrI, 0.44-0.95); however, fractures were statistically similar between apixaban and rivaroxaban (OR, 0.84; 95% CrI, 0.58-1.24) and dabigatran and rivaroxaban (OR, 1.32; 95% CrI, 0.90-1.87). Based on the Bayesian model of NMA, the probability of osteoporotic fracture was highest with VKA and lowest with apixaban, followed by rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran.
Conclusions
The decision to prescribe anticoagulants in elderly patients with AF should be made not only based on thrombotic and bleeding risks but also on the risk of osteoporotic fracture; these factors should be considered and incorporated in contemporary cardiology practice.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • 1. Medication-induced fractures: Screening and treatment strategies
    Laraib Javed, Aemen Khakwani, Uzair Khan, Mary Beth Humphrey
    The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.2025; 369(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • 2. Comparative risk of osteoporotic fractures with direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in atrial fibrillation patients: a systematic review
    Azad Mojahedi
    International Journal of Burns and Trauma.2025; 15(3): 83.     CrossRef
  • 3. Osteoporosis Etiology, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Diet, and Treatment: A Narrative Review
    Behzad Foroutan
    OBM Geriatrics.2024; 08(02): 1.     CrossRef
  • 4. The interplay between bone and heart health as reflected in medication effects: A narrative review
    Susanne Trost, Nolawit Tesfaye, Tasma Harindhanavudhi
    Women's Health.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 5. Effects of oral anticoagulants on bone health (systematic literature review)
    H.V. Mostbauer, T.A. Karasevska, L.P. Antonenko, Iu.V. Rudenko, A.B. Bezrodnyi
    PAIN, JOINTS, SPINE.2023; 13(3): 201.     CrossRef
  • 6. Hip fractures risks in edoxaban versus warfarin users: A propensity score-matched population-based cohort study with competing risk analyses
    Jiandong Zhou, Sharen Lee, Xuejin Liu, Danish Iltaf Satti, Teddy Tai Loy Lee, Oscar Hou In Chou, Carlin Chang, Leonardo Roever, Wing Tak Wong, Abraham Ka Chung Wai, Tong Liu, Qingpeng Zhang, Gary Tse
    Bone.2022; 156: 116303.     CrossRef
  • 7. Antikoagulation und Knochenstoffwechsel
    Rudolf W. Gasser
    Journal für Mineralstoffwechsel & Muskuloskelettale Erkrankungen.2022; 29(3): 74.     CrossRef
  • 8,937 View
  • 191 Download
  • Crossref
Background

The effects of subclinical hyperthyroidism on bone mineral density (BMD) induced by thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression therapy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the influence of TSH suppression therapy on BMD.

Methods

We performed a systematic search to identify studies which included BMD measurement of femoral neck, total hip or lumbar spine in patients on TSH suppression therapy for DTC. Main outcome measures were difference of BMD of femoral neck, total hip or lumbar spine measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry between patients and controls.

Results

A systematic search yielded a total of 11 published controlled cross-sectional studies (including about 571 patients and 836 controls). TSH suppression therapy was associated with the lower BMD of total hip (weighted mean difference [WMD], −0.023; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.047 to 0.000; P=0.050) and spine (WMD, −0.041; 95% CI, −0.057 to −0.026; P<0.001) in postmenopausal women with DTC, while it was not associated with that in premenopausal women and men with DTC.

Conclusions

Although the included studies were limited by small numbers, results suggested possible association between chronic TSH suppression therapy and the lower BMD of spine and total hip in postmenopausal women (but not in premenopausal women and men) with DTC. A large, well-designed study with long-term follow-up would provide further insight into the influence of TSH suppression therapy and loss of BMD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • 1. TSH suppression attenuates the early efficacy of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis
    Yujuan Liu, Yilei Zhang, Meiye Li, Ying Qian, Zongjing Zhang, Zhaoshun Jiang, Wei Qu
    Archives of Osteoporosis.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 2. Korean Thyroid Association Guidelines on the Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancers; Part II. Follow-up Surveillance after Initial Treatment 2026
    Eun Kyung Lee, Seung Heon Kang, Bon Seok Koo, Mijin Kim, Min Joo Kim, Bo Hyun Kim, Ji Won Kim, Dong Gyu Na, Sohyun Park, Ji-In Bang, Kyorim Back, Youngduk Seo, Young-Ik Son, Young Shin Song, Dong Yeob Shin, Jong-Hyuk Ahn, Hwa Young Ahn, So Won Oh, Ho-Ryun
    International Journal of Thyroidology.2026; 19(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • 3. Molecular pathways and emerging therapeutic strategies in advanced thyroid cancer: from targeted therapy to precision oncology
    Tanmoy Sarkar, Ruhi Arisha, Shivam Sengupta, Bharat Bhushan, Hitesh Kumar Dewangan
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4. Effects of vitamin D3 and calcium supplementation on bone of young adults after thyroidectomy of differentiated thyroid carcinoma
    Lei Sun, Xiaoyun Lin, Naishi Li, Qian Zhang, Yan Jiang, Ou Wang, Weibo Xia, Xiaoping Xing, Xiaoyi Li, Mei Li
    Endocrine.2025; 88(3): 836.     CrossRef
  • 5. Photodynamic Therapy for Thyroid Cancer
    Julia Inglot, Joanna Katarzyna Strzelczyk, Dorota Bartusik-Aebisher, David Aebisher
    BioMed.2025; 5(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • 6. Prevalence of and Predictive Factors for Hypothyroidism Following Hemithyroidectomy
    Fadwa Cherni, Makram Tbini, Ines Riahi, Sarra Idriss, Rihab Laamouri, Mamia Ben Salah
    Ear, Nose & Throat Journal.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7. Nano-approaches and Recent Advancements in Strategies to Combat Challenges Associated with Thyroid Cancer Therapies
    Gurmehar Singh, Jatin Rathee, Triveni, Neha Jain, Upendra Nagaich, Shreya Kaul, Manisha Pandey, Bapi Gorain
    Recent Patents on Nanotechnology.2025; 19(3): 381.     CrossRef
  • 8. The effect of menopausal hormone therapy on thyroid cancer survivors from the National Health Insurance Database in South Korea cohort
    Jin-Sung Yuk, Jin Li Lee, Yeonjin Shin, Gwan Hee Han, Sang-Hee Yoon, Myoung Hwan Kim, Ji Hyun Noh, Yujin Lee, Jungbin Kim, Sam-Youl Yoon, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Byung Noe Bae, Ki Whan Kim, Geumhee Gwak
    European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2025; 310: 113983.     CrossRef
  • 9. Risk of Osteoporotic Fractures among Patients with Thyroid Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study
    Eu Jeong Ku, Won Sang Yoo, Yu Been Hwang, Subin Jang, Jooyoung Lee, Shinje Moon, Eun Kyung Lee, Hwa Young Ahn
    Endocrinology and Metabolism.2025; 40(2): 225.     CrossRef
  • 10. Effect of Psychosomatic Symptom Intervention on Psychosomatic Symptoms During Initial Treatment in Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
    Shuhua Luo, Xiaoxiao Wei, Jiaxin Zhao, Zhiqing Zhou, Lingling Zheng, Yuan Yang, Li Liu
    Cancer Nursing.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 11. Levothyroxine therapy in thyroidectomized patients: ongoing challenges and controversies
    Leonardo Rossi, Marinunzia Paternoster, Mattia Cammarata, Sohail Bakkar, Paolo Miccoli
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 12. Effect of Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Suppression on Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Single Center Retrospective Study
    Meihua Jin, Won Sang Yoo
    Journal of Bone Metabolism.2025; 32(3): 221.     CrossRef
  • 13. Longitudinal Bone Density During TSH Suppression in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Paired PET/CT Analysis
    Holger Einspieler, Hannah Klimpfinger, Song Xue, Aleksandar Debeljkovic, Bettina Reiterits, Bengt Hennig, Marcus Hacker, Georgios Karanikas
    Cancers.2025; 17(21): 3462.     CrossRef
  • 14. Association between serum TSH concentration and bone mineral density: an umbrella review
    Martyna Dziedzic, Michał Bonczar, Patryk Ostrowski, Bartłomiej Stachera, Dawid Plutecki, Monika Buziak-Bereza, Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, Jerzy Walocha, Mateusz Koziej
    Hormones.2024; 23(3): 547.     CrossRef
  • 15. The Effect of Thyrotropin Suppression on Survival Outcomes in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sriram Gubbi, Mohammad Al-Jundi, Peter Foerster, Stephanie Cardenas, Gisela Butera, Sungyoung Auh, Elizabeth Chalmers Wright, Joanna Klubo-Gwiezdzinska
    Thyroid®.2024; 34(6): 674.     CrossRef
  • 16. Clinical inertia in thyrotropin suppressive therapy for low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: A real-world experience at an endocrine center in Bangkok
    Yotsapon Thewjitcharoen, Waralee Chatchomchuan, Ekgaluck Wanothayaroj, Siriwan Butadej, Soontaree Nakasatien, Sirinate Krittiyawong, Rajata Rajatanavin, Thep Himathongkam
    Medicine.2024; 103(21): e38290.     CrossRef
  • 17. Korean Thyroid Association Guidelines on the Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancers; Part II. Follow-up Surveillance after Initial Treatment 2024
    Mijin Kim, Ji-In Bang, Ho-Cheol Kang, Sun Wook Kim, Dong Gyu Na, Young Joo Park, Youngduk Seo, Young Shin Song, So Won Oh, Sang-Woo Lee, Eun Kyung Lee, Ji Ye Lee, Dong-Jun Lim, Ari Chong, Yun Jae Chung, Chae Moon Hong, Min Kyoung Lee, Bo Hyun Kim
    International Journal of Thyroidology.2024; 17(1): 115.     CrossRef
  • 18. How does Hashimoto’s thyroiditis affect bone metabolism?
    Jialu Wu, Hui Huang, Xijie Yu
    Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders.2023; 24(2): 191.     CrossRef
  • 19. Levothyroxine suppressive therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer treatment
    Jan Drugda, Jan Čáp, Mikuláš Kosák, Filip Gabalec
    Vnitřní lékařství.2023; 69(2): 128.     CrossRef
  • 20. Evaluation and Management of Bone Health in Patients with Thyroid Diseases: A Position Statement of the Korean Thyroid Association
    A Ram Hong, Ho-Cheol Kang
    Endocrinology and Metabolism.2023; 38(2): 175.     CrossRef
  • 21. Factors related to bone mineral density in female patients receiving TSH-suppressive doses of levothyroxine for thyroid cancer
    Araya Boonyaleepan, Tarit Taerakul
    The ASEAN Journal of Radiology.2023; 24(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • 22. Risk factors for thyroid hormone replacement therapy after hemithyroidectomy and development of a predictive nomogram
    Zhen Cao, Rui Liu, Mengwei Wu, Xiequn Xu, Ziwen Liu
    Endocrine.2022; 76(1): 85.     CrossRef
  • 23. Bone‐density testing interval and transition to osteoporosis in differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients on TSH suppression therapy
    Hyunju Park, Jun Park, Heejin Yoo, Seonwoo Kim, Jang Hyun Koh, Jae Hwan Jee, Yong‐Ki Min, Jae Hoon Chung, Tae Hyuk Kim, Mira Kang, Sun Wook Kim
    Clinical Endocrinology.2022; 97(1): 130.     CrossRef
  • 24. Effects and Mechanisms of Rhus chinensis Mill. Fruits on Suppressing RANKL-Induced Osteoclastogenesis by Network Pharmacology and Validation in RAW264.7 Cells
    Yue Zheng, Lei Zhao, Junjie Yi, Shengbao Cai
    Nutrients.2022; 14(5): 1020.     CrossRef
  • 25. Evaluation and Management of Bone Health in Patients with Thyroid Diseases: a Position Statement from the Korean Thyroid Association
    A Ram Hong, Hwa Young Ahn, Bu Kyung Kim, Seong Hee Ahn, So Young Park, Min-Hee Kim, Jeongmin Lee, Sun Wook Cho, Ho-Cheol Kang
    International Journal of Thyroidology.2022; 15(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • 26. Effects of TSH suppressive therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer in Northeast China: a prospective controlled cohort study
    Shiwei Wang, Yu Wang, Li Zhu, Liang He, Mutian Lv, Hao Zhang, Haoyu Wang, Fan Zhang, Yaxin Lai, Yushu Li, Zhongyan Shan, Weiping Teng
    Endocrine.2022; 79(1): 113.     CrossRef
  • 27. Application and prospect of trabecular bone score in differentiated thyroid cancer patients receiving thyrotropin suppression therapy
    Bingyu Ran, Feng Wei, Jian Gong, Hao Xu
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 28. The risk between thyrotropin suppression and bone mineral density in differentiated thyroid cancer
    Yang Zou, Bin Li, Xiaodong Wang, Jingxin Mao, Yanyan Zhang
    Medicine.2022; 101(48): e31991.     CrossRef
  • 29. Skeletal health in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma
    M. Cellini, M. Rotondi, M. L. Tanda, E. Piantanida, L. Chiovato, P. Beck-Peccoz, Andrea Lania, G. Mazziotti
    Journal of Endocrinological Investigation.2021; 44(3): 431.     CrossRef
  • 30. Trabecular bone score in women with differentiated thyroid cancer on long-term TSH-suppressive therapy
    B. É. C. A. Sousa, B. C. Silva, T. de Oliveira Guidotti, M. C. Pires, M. M. S. Soares, A. M. Kakehasi
    Journal of Endocrinological Investigation.2021; 44(10): 2295.     CrossRef
  • 31. Effects of thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression after thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Donghee Kwak, Jane Ha, Yousun Won, Yeongkeun Kwon, Sungsoo Park
    BMJ Open.2021; 11(5): e043007.     CrossRef
  • 32. Effect of TSH Suppression Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Eu Jeong Ku, Won Sang Yoo, Eun Kyung Lee, Hwa Young Ahn, Seung Hoon Woo, Jun Hwa Hong, Hyun Kyung Chung, Jin-Woo Park
    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 33. Thyrotropin, Hyperthyroidism, and Bone Mass
    Se-Min Kim, Vitaly Ryu, Sari Miyashita, Funda Korkmaz, Daria Lizneva, Sakshi Gera, Rauf Latif, Terry F Davies, Jameel Iqbal, Tony Yuen, Mone Zaidi
    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 34. TSH Suppression Therapy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer May Be Associated with Lower Bone Density in Postmenopausal Women
    Sun Y. Lee
    Clinical Thyroidology.2021; 33(9): 406.     CrossRef
  • 35. Thyroid Hormone Diseases and Osteoporosis
    Alessandro P. Delitala, Angelo Scuteri, Carlo Doria
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(4): 1034.     CrossRef
  • 36. The Molecular Function and Clinical Role of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Receptor in Cancer Cells
    Yu-De Chu, Chau-Ting Yeh
    Cells.2020; 9(7): 1730.     CrossRef
  • 37. Bone mineral density and its correlation with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in patients with hyperthyroidism
    Haixia Liu, Qihang Ma, Xinli Han, Wenwen Huang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 38. TSH suppressive therapy and bone
    Alessandro Brancatella, Claudio Marcocci
    Endocrine Connections.2020; 9(7): R158.     CrossRef
  • 39. Integrated pathological cell fishing and network pharmacology approach to investigate main active components of Er-Xian decotion for treating osteoporosis
    Nani Wang, Pingcui Xu, Xuping Wang, Weixuan Yao, Zhongming Yu, Renjie Wu, Xiaowen Huang, Yuyang Si, Dan Shou
    Journal of Ethnopharmacology.2019; 241: 111977.     CrossRef
  • 40. Thyroid hormone therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer
    Giorgio Grani, Valeria Ramundo, Antonella Verrienti, Marialuisa Sponziello, Cosimo Durante
    Endocrine.2019; 66(1): 43.     CrossRef
  • 7,576 View
  • 100 Download
  • Crossref
Background

This study's objective was to evaluate the association between proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use and bone fracture incidence and bone mineral density (BMD) by meta-analyzing the estimates reported by epidemiological and cohort studies.

Methods

Data were acquired from studies identified after a literature search in electronic databases. Odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and risk ratios (RRs) between PPI use and bone fracture incidence were pooled under the random effects model, and meta-analysis of standardized mean differences between PPI users and controls in cross-sectional values and BMD changes was conducted.

Results

Thirty-three studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. These studies provided data from 2,714,502 individuals with a mean age of 66.91 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.37–70.46); 33.21% (95% CI, 30.44–35.99) were males and 64.61% (95% CI, 60.73–68.49) were females. Overall, fracture incidence was 22.04% (95% CI, 16.10–27.97) in PPI users and 15.57% (95% CI, 12.28–18.86) in controls. The overall effect size of the point estimate was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.22–1.35) between PPI use and bone fracture incidence. There was a trend towards increased fracture incidence from short duration use: OR 1.29 (95% CI, 1.19–1.40), medium duration use: OR 1.33 (95% CI, 1.12–1.55) and long duration use: OR 1.62 (95% CI, 1.33–1.90). There was no significant difference in the standardized mean differences between PPI users and controls, either in cross-sectional BMD values or in the BMD change observed in longitudinal studies.

Conclusions

Pooling of ORs, HRs, and RRs suggested that PPI use might increase fracture risk. However, there was no effect of PPI use on BMD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • 1. Cost-Effectiveness of RefluxStop Versus Nissen Fundoplication and Proton Pump Inhibitors for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Spanish Healthcare Perspective
    Sam Harper, Khanh Ha Bui, Stuart Mealing, Daniel Sanchez, Pablo Priego Jiménez, Carlos Moreno Sanz
    PharmacoEconomics - Open.2026; 10(2): 249.     CrossRef
  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of RefluxStop for gastroesophageal reflux disease: analysis from an Italian healthcare perspective
    Sam Harper, Muralikrishnan Kartha, Stuart Mealing, Davide Bona, Leonardo Vincenti, Adolfo Renzi, Luigi Bonavina
    BMC Gastroenterology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 3. Impact of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy on Bone Mineral Density: An Updated Systematic Review
    Chalini Sundar, Darshan Devang Divakar, S. Saravana Kumar, Annapoorani Manoharan, Sundar Ramalingam
    Cureus.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4. Pre-operative proton pump inhibitor use and risk of adverse outcomes after total elbow arthroplasty: a propensity-matched analysis
    Nicholas Frappa, Morgan R. Dillon, Samuel I. Fuller, Alexandra Divasta, Vahram Gamsarian, Matthew G. Alben
    Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 5. Association of Potentially Inappropriate Medications and Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index with Frailty in Elderly Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease
    Pei-Ru Lin, Chew-Teng Kor, Yu-Chung Wei, Yen-Tze Liu
    Diagnostics.2026; 16(13): 2094.     CrossRef
  • 6. Differential fracture risk among proton pump inhibitors in older adults: evidence network and pharmacovigilance validation
    Hui-ling Piao, Zeng-hao Wu, Ling-yun Zhou, Chang-hong Lai, Zhi-yao Tang, Wen-jun Yin, Yi-hu Yi
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7. Medication-induced fractures: Screening and treatment strategies
    Laraib Javed, Aemen Khakwani, Uzair Khan, Mary Beth Humphrey
    The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.2025; 369(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • 8. Sex-specific Association of Chronic Proton Pump Inhibitor Use With Reduced Bone Density and Quality
    Fabio Bioletto, Alessia Pusterla, Federica Fraire, Lorenzo Sauro, Michela Presti, Emanuela Arvat, Ezio Ghigo, Massimo Procopio, Marco Barale
    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2025; 110(6): e2071.     CrossRef
  • 9. A cost-effectiveness analysis of RefluxStop against relevant therapeutic alternatives for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease in Sweden
    Sam Harper, Muralikrishnan Kartha, Stuart Mealing, Lars Lundell
    Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research.2025; 25(3): 353.     CrossRef
  • 10. Fracture Risk Linked to Proton Pump Inhibitors Versus H2 Receptor Antagonists in Autoimmune Rheumatic and Gastrointestinal Disease Patients
    Miaoyu Zeng, Yung‐Heng Lee, Shiow‐Ing Wang, Andriko Palmowski, Wei‐Min Chu, Frank Buttgereit
    International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 11. Correlation of Fractal Dimensions and Mandibular Cortical Index Assessed Using Panoramic Radiographs in Subjects on Proton Pump Inhibitors Therapy with Serum Biochemical Parameters: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study
    B. Suman, Mahima A. Mehta, Vijayalakshmi K. R., H. L. Vishwanath, Vibha C.
    Journal of the California Dental Association.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 12. Inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons, métabolisme osseux et phosphocalcique
    Cécile Philippoteaux, Julien Paccou, Emmanuel Chazard, Bernard Cortet
    Revue du Rhumatisme.2025; 92(4): 410.     CrossRef
  • 13. Proton pump inhibitor exposure, trabecular bone score, and BMD: a registry-based cohort study
    Fatima Zarzour, John T Schousboe, Neil Binkley, Didier Hans, William D Leslie
    Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.2025; 40(8): 965.     CrossRef
  • 14. Regular Proton-Pump Inhibitor Intake is Associated with Deterioration of Peripheral Bone Mineral Density, Microarchitecture, and Strength in Older Patients as Assessed by High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (HR-pQCT)
    Ursula Heilmeier, Alexandra Siegenthaler, Ursina Meyer, Marie Boensch, Melanie Kistler-Fischbacher, Caroline de Godoi Rezende Costa Molino, Bert van Rietbergen, Wei Lang, René Rizzoli, Robert Theiler, Andreas Egli, Heike Annette Bischoff-Ferrari
    Calcified Tissue International.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 15. Cost-effectiveness of RefluxStop compared to proton pump inhibitors and Nissen fundoplication for management of persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease in Norway
    Sam Harper, Muralikrishnan Kartha, Stuart Mealing, Lars Eftang, Robin Gaupset
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 16. Changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients administered proton pump inhibitors: a single-center cohort study
    Takuma Murofushi, Tatsuya Yagi, Daiki Tsuji, Daisuke Furushima, Tomoyuki Fujikura, Kunihiko Itoh, Junichi Kawakami
    Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.2024; 397(7): 4927.     CrossRef
  • 17. Budget Impact of RefluxStop™ as a Treatment for Patients with Refractory Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease in the United Kingdom
    Sam Harper, Lukasz Grodzicki, Stuart Mealing, Elizabeth Gemmill, Paul Goldsmith, Ahmed Ahmed
    Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 18. Budget Impact of RefluxStopTM as a Treatment for Patients with Refractory Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease in the United Kingdom
    Sam Harper, Lukasz Grodzicki, Stuart Mealing, Elizabeth Gemmill, Paul Goldsmith, Ahmed Ahmed
    Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • 19. Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Risk of Bloodstream Infection without an Identifiable Source: a Hospital-Based Case-Control Study
    Shintaro Hayashi, Tomohito Moriyama, Yuichiro Ito, Yuta Harada, Hiroki Dodo, Kana Kumahara, Tatsuji Yogi, Noritsugu Ohashi, Reiji Higashi, Akihiro Mori
    Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases.2024; 77(4): 205.     CrossRef
  • 20. Osseous implications of proton pump inhibitor therapy: An umbrella review
    Abdullah S. Alanazi, Hadiah Almutairi, Jeetendra Kumar Gupta, Dibyalochan Mohanty, Deepankar Rath, Ali A. AlOdan, Ahmed Mahal, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Shilpa Gaidhane, Quazi Syed Zahiruddin, Sarvesh Rustagi, Prakasini Satapathy, Hashem Abu Serhan
    Bone Reports.2024; 20: 101741.     CrossRef
  • 21. Self-controlled Case Series Study for Acute Kidney Injury after Starting Proton Pump Inhibitors or Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker in Patients with Cancer Using a Large Claims Database
    Kosuke Suzuki, Ayako Watanabe, Yoshihiro Kiryu, Eisuke Inoue, Kenji Momo
    Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin.2024; 47(2): 518.     CrossRef
  • 22. PPI use is not associated with bone microarchitecture and strength assessed with HR-pQCT after three-years follow-up in patients visiting the Fracture Liaison Service
    M.R. Schene, M.S.A.M. Bevers, W.J.F. van der Vijgh, J.H.M. Driessen, L. Vranken, R.Y. van der Velde, H.C. Willems, C.E. Wyers, J.P. van den Bergh
    Bone.2024; 182: 117066.     CrossRef
  • 23. Proton pump inhibitors, bone and phosphocalcic metabolism
    Cécile Philippoteaux, Julien Paccou, Emmanuel Chazard, Bernard Cortet
    Joint Bone Spine.2024; 91(5): 105714.     CrossRef
  • 24. Effect of long-term proton pump inhibitors on phosphocalcium metabolism and bone mineral density
    Hend Smaoui, Lassaad Chtourou, Dana Jallouli, Samar Ben Jemaa, Iheb Karaa, Mouna Boudabbous, Manel Moalla, Hela Gdoura, Leila Mnif, Ali Amouri, Rim Akrout, Fatma Ayadi, Sofien Baklouti, Nabil Tahri
    Future Science OA.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 25. Cost-effectiveness of the RefluxStop device for management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in Switzerland
    Sam Harper, Muralikrishnan Kartha, Stuart Mealing, Yves M. Borbély, Jörg Zehetner
    Journal of Medical Economics.2024; 27(1): 805.     CrossRef
  • 26. Towards a Prescription for Change: Interprofessional Management of Polypharmacy and Deprescribing
    Aimee Elizabeth Perron
    Current Geriatrics Reports.2024; 13(3): 152.     CrossRef
  • 27. Multidisciplinary Consensus for Rationalizing the Use of Acid Suppressants in Children and Adults: CONFOR
    Vijay Kher, Manav Wadhawan, Arun Wadhwa, Sadanand Shetty, Shrish Bhatnagar, Ram Y Prabhoo, Uday A Pai, Bhanu V Pillai, Chris D'souza, Manish Bhatnagar, Meena R Prabhoo, Venkatesh P Seshadri, Subhash C Manchanda
    Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology.2024; 14(1): 99.     CrossRef
  • 28. The Economic Impact of Introducing RefluxStop for Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on the Italian Healthcare System
    Sam Harper, Muralikrishnan Kartha, Stuart Mealing, Maurizio Pavanello, Luigi Bonavina
    PharmacoEconomics - Open.2024; 8(6): 935.     CrossRef
  • 29. Potential Risks Associated With Long-term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Maintenance Treatment Modality for Patients With Mild Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Seung Young Kim, Kwang Jae Lee
    Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2024; 30(4): 407.     CrossRef
  • 30. Association between exposure to proton pump inhibitors and delirium: a descriptive and disproportionality analysis of VigiBase
    Alexandre Decros, Elise-Marie Minoc, Véronique Lelong-Boulouard, Basile Chrétien, Alexandre Meurant, Joachim Alexandre, Charles Dolladille, Cédric Villain
    BMJ Open.2024; 14(10): e081911.     CrossRef
  • 31. Widening spectrum of adverse effects caused by long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: A comprehensive review of literature
    Ather Ahad Mir, Zahoor Ahmad Wani, Ajmal R. Bhat, Khairi M. Fahelelbom, Ankush Kumar, Sumeer Ahmed
    LabMed Discovery.2024; 1(2): 100027.     CrossRef
  • 32. Cost-effectiveness of a novel, non-active implantable device as a treatment for refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease
    Sam Harper, Lukasz Grodzicki, Stuart Mealing, Liz Gemmill, Paul J. Goldsmith, Ahmed R. Ahmed
    Journal of Medical Economics.2023; 26(1): 603.     CrossRef
  • 33. Vitamin B12 deficiency and use of proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arup Choudhury, Anuraag Jena, Vaneet Jearth, Amit K Dutta, Govind Makharia, Usha Dutta, Mahesh Goenka, Rakesh Kochhar, Vishal Sharma
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2023; 17(5): 479.     CrossRef
  • 34. The association between proton pump inhibitors and hyperparathyroidism: a potential mechanism for increased fracture—results of a large observational cohort study
    Donal Fitzpatrick, Rosaleen Lannon, Eamon Laird, Mary Ward, Leane Hoey, Catherine F. Hughes, J. J. Strain, Conal Cunningham, Helene McNulty, Anne M. Molloy, Kevin McCarroll
    Osteoporosis International.2023; 34(11): 1917.     CrossRef
  • 35. Pantoprazole‐Induced Bone Loss through Gastrin Secretion: A Stereological Study
    Forough Saki, Mesbah Shams, Sanaz Dastghaib, Farhad Koohpeyma, Sushil K. Jha
    BioMed Research International.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 36. Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors adversely affects minerals and vitamin metabolism, bone turnover, bone mass, and bone strength
    Md. Saddam Hussain, Tanoy Mazumder
    Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology.2022; 33(5): 567.     CrossRef
  • 37. Association of proton‐pump inhibitor use with adverse health outcomes: A systematic umbrella review of meta‐analyses of cohort studies and randomised controlled trials
    Sajesh K. Veettil, Saranrat Sadoyu, Elizabeth M Bald, Viji P. Chandran, Scott Anh Tuan Khuu, Panitan Pitak, Yeong Yeh Lee, Athira Balakrishnan Nair, Paul T. Antony, Alexander C. Ford, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
    British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.2022; 88(4): 1551.     CrossRef
  • 38. Current options and investigational drugs for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis
    Sonsoles Tamarit-Sebastian, Francisco Miguel Ferrer-Soler, Alfredo J Lucendo
    Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs.2022; 31(2): 193.     CrossRef
  • 39. The views of African and Middle Eastern Gastroenterologists on the management of mild-to-moderate, non-erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)
    Ahmed Al-Marhabi, Ahmed Hashem, Bader Faiyaz Zuberi, Charles Onyekwere, Imran Lodhi, Mohamed Mounir, Saad Alkhowaiter, Sameer Al Awadhi, Vasudevan G. Naidoo, Yasser Hamada
    Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 16(3): 217.     CrossRef
  • 40. The Association between Helicobacter pylori Seropositivity and Bone Mineral Density in Adults
    Jinke Huang, Zhihong Liu, Jinxin Ma, Jiali Liu, Mi Lv, Fengyun Wang, Xudong Tang, Hongmei Jiang
    Mediators of Inflammation.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • 41. Drug treatment strategies for eosinophilic esophagitis in adults
    Alfredo J Lucendo
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy.2022; 23(7): 827.     CrossRef
  • 42. Outcomes associated with proton pump inhibitors and distal radius fractures: A post-hoc comparative analysis
    Kevin M. Klifto, David S. Ruch, Suhail K. Mithani, Tyler S. Pidgeon, Marc J. Richard, Christopher S. Klifto
    Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery.2022; 75(8): 2650.     CrossRef
  • 43. A comparison of survival models for prediction of eight-year revision risk following total knee and hip arthroplasty
    Alana R. Cuthbert, Lynne C. Giles, Gary Glonek, Lisa M. Kalisch Ellett, Nicole L. Pratt
    BMC Medical Research Methodology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 44. Rebuilding trust in proton pump inhibitor therapy
    Alla Turshudzhyan, Sonia Samuel, Angela Tawfik, Micheal Tadros
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(24): 2667.     CrossRef
  • 45. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Bone Health: An Update Narrative Review
    Eric Lespessailles, Hechmi Toumi
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(18): 10733.     CrossRef
  • 46. Increased Risk of Fractures and Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Menopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Thuila Ferreira da Maia, Bruna Gafo de Camargo, Meire Ellen Pereira, Cláudia Sirlene de Oliveira, Izonete Cristina Guiloski
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(20): 13501.     CrossRef
  • 47. Key Considerations From a Health Authority Perspective When Proton Pump Inhibitors Are Used to Treat Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Their Implications
    Johanna C Meyer, Sean MacBride-Stewart , Joseph O Fadare, Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun, Mainul Haque, Amos Massele, Santosh Kumar, Israel Abebrese Sefah, Phumzile P Skosana , Brian Godman
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 48. The therapeutic importance of acid-base balance
    Bianca N. Quade, Mark D. Parker, Rossana Occhipinti
    Biochemical Pharmacology.2021; 183: 114278.     CrossRef
  • 49. Actualización en la prescripción de inhibidores de la bomba de protones. Qué hacer y qué no hacer
    G.M. Saiz Ladera, M.E. Pejenaute Labari, J.N. García Pascual
    Medicina de Familia. SEMERGEN.2021; 47(4): 267.     CrossRef
  • 50. Different elemental infant formulas show equivalent phosphorus and calcium bioavailability in healthy volunteers
    Clemens Bergwitz, Simone R.B.M. Eussen, Pilou L.H.R. Janssens, Monique Visser, Thomas O. Carpenter, Ardy van Helvoort
    Nutrition Research.2021; 85: 71.     CrossRef
  • 51. Herbal medicines in functional dyspepsia—Untapped opportunities not without risks
    Kok‐Ann Gwee, Gerald Holtmann, Jan Tack, Hidekazu Suzuki, Jinsong Liu, Yinglian Xiao, Min‐Hu Chen, Xiaohua Hou, Deng‐Chyang Wu, Clarissa Toh, Fang Lu, Xu‐Dong Tang
    Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 52. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Fractures in Adults: A Critical Appraisal and Review of the Literature
    Silvia Irina Briganti, Anda Mihaela Naciu, Gaia Tabacco, Roberto Cesareo, Nicola Napoli, Pierpaolo Trimboli, Marco Castellana, Silvia Manfrini, Andrea Palermo, Arturo Bevilacqua
    International Journal of Endocrinology.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • 53. Low-dose PPI to prevent bleeding after ESD: A multicenter randomized controlled study
    Li Yang, Jian Qi, Weiqing Chen, Qinghong Guo, Rui Xie, Zhifeng Zhao, Shanyu Qin, Aiming Liu, Mingming Den, Chaoqiang Fan, Jianyin Bai, Hui Lin, Hong Guo, Shiming Yang
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2021; 136: 111251.     CrossRef
  • 54. Comment on: Metabolic bone changes after bariatric surgery: 2020 update, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issues Committee position statement
    Michel Gagner
    Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases.2021; 17(6): 1229.     CrossRef
  • 55. Use of proton pump inhibitors is associated with lower hemoglobin levels in people with cystic fibrosis
    Alex H. Gifford, Julie L. Sanville, Meghana Sathe, Sonya L. Heltshe, Christopher H. Goss
    Pediatric Pulmonology.2021; 56(7): 2048.     CrossRef
  • 56. Phosphorus bioaccessibility measured in four amino acid–based  formulas using in-vitro batch digestion translates well into phosphorus bioavailability in mice
    Sampada Chande, Francina Dijk, Jonathan Fetene, Steven Yannicelli, Thomas O. Carpenter, Ardy van Helvoort, Clemens Bergwitz
    Nutrition.2021; 89: 111291.     CrossRef
  • 57. Umbrella review of 42 systematic reviews with meta‐analyses: the safety of proton pump inhibitors
    Elizabeth M. Salvo, Nicole C. Ferko, Sarah B. Cash, Ailish Gonzalez, Peter J. Kahrilas
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2021; 54(2): 129.     CrossRef
  • 58. Effect of Omeprazole on Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts in vivo and in the in vitro Model Using Fish Scales
    Mohamed I. Zanaty, Adel Abdel-Moneim, Yoichiro Kitani, Toshio Sekiguchi, Nobuo Suzuki
    Biochemistry (Moscow).2021; 86(10): 1192.     CrossRef
  • 59. Влияние омепразола на остеобласты и остеокласты in vivo и в модели in vitro с использованием чешуи рыбы
    M.I. Zanaty, A. Abdel-Moneim, Y. Kitani, T. Sekiguchi, N. Suzuki
    Биохимия.2021; 86(10): 1423.     CrossRef
  • 60. Proton‐Pump Inhibitors
    Marta Tavares, Jorge Amil‐Dias
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.2021; 73(6): 665.     CrossRef
  • 61. Proton Pompa İnhibitörlerinin Kırık Oluşumuna Etkisi ve Bakıma Yansıması
    Seda AKUTAY, Özlem CEYHAN
    Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi.2021; 14(1): 62.     CrossRef
  • 62. Hospitalized fracture rates amongst patients with chronic kidney disease in Australia using data linkage
    Raymond Lin, Nigel D. Toussaint, Martin Gallagher, Alan Cass, Sradha Kotwal
    Nephrology.2020; 25(6): 475.     CrossRef
  • 63. Targeted Therapies for Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders
    Alfredo J. Lucendo, Piedad López-Sánchez
    BioDrugs.2020; 34(4): 477.     CrossRef
  • 64.

    Effects of Calcium and Annatto Tocotrienol Supplementation on Bone Loss Induced by Pantoprazole in Male Rats


    Kok-Yong Chin, Benjamin Ka Seng Thong, Rhivaldy Faahim Kamalulloh, Nur Vaizura Mohamad, Sok Kuan Wong, Azlan Mohd Arlamsyah, Rahma Triliana, Ima Nirwana Soelaiman
    Drug Design, Development and Therapy.2020; Volume 14: 2561.     CrossRef
  • 65. Potential proton pump inhibitor–related adverse effects
    Issac E. Perry, Irene Sonu, Carmelo Scarpignato, Junichi Akiyama, Michio Hongo, Kenneth J. Vega
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.2020; 1481(1): 43.     CrossRef
  • 66. The Clinical Characteristics of Fractures in Pediatric Patients Exposed to Proton Pump Inhibitors
    Nathan Fleishman, Troy Richardson, Thomas Attard
    Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.2020; 70(6): 815.     CrossRef
  • 67. Pharmacological treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis: current options and emerging therapies
    Alfredo J Lucendo
    Expert Review of Clinical Immunology.2020; 16(1): 63.     CrossRef
  • 68. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Osteoporosis: Is Collagen a Direct Target?
    Yohannes T. Ghebre
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 69. Association between proton pump inhibitor use and risk of fracture: A population-based case-control study
    Jong Joo Kim, Eun Jin Jang, Jiwon Park, Hyun Soon Sohn, Robert Daniel Blank
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(7): e0235163.     CrossRef
  • 70. Does the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors Increase the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies
    Hee-Eun Hong, A-Sol Kim, Mi-Rae Kim, Hae-Jin Ko, Min Kyu Jung
    Cancers.2020; 12(8): 2220.     CrossRef
  • 71. Evidence-based application of explicit criteria to assess the appropriateness of geriatric prescriptions at admission and hospital stay
    Enrica Di Martino, Alessio Provenzani, Piera Polidori, Vincenzo De Luca
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(8): e0238064.     CrossRef
  • 72. Helicobacter pylori Related Diseases and Osteoporotic Fractures (Narrative Review)
    Leon Fisher, Alexander Fisher, Paul N Smith
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(10): 3253.     CrossRef
  • 73. Effect of proton pump inhibitors on bone mineral density: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Sara Aleraij, Sultan Alhowti, Mazen Ferwana, Imad Abdulmajeed, Ibrahim Mohsen Mutawwam
    Bone Reports.2020; 13: 100732.     CrossRef
  • 74. Diabetes Mellitus and Osteoporosis Correlation: Challenges and Hopes
    Moein Ala, Razieh Mohammad Jafari, Ahmad Reza Dehpour
    Current Diabetes Reviews.2020; 16(9): 984.     CrossRef
  • 75. Proton pump inhibitors therapy and risk of bone diseases: An update meta-analysis
    Jian Liu, Xianqing Li, Lei Fan, Jie Yang, Jiecong Wang, Jiaming Sun, Zhenxing Wang
    Life Sciences.2019; 218: 213.     CrossRef
  • 76. Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Fracture Risk: An Update of Drug Safety Communication Needed?
    Toshihiro Sugiyama
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 114(2): 360.     CrossRef
  • 77. Association of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Risk of Fracture Based on the National Health Insurance Sample Cohort Database (2002~2013)
    Jong Joo Kim, Eun Jin Jang, Junwoo Cho, Hyun Soon Sohn
    Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.2019; 29(3): 147.     CrossRef
  • 78. Association between Peptic Ulcer Disease and Osteoporosis: The Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study in Korea
    Phill Hoon Yoon, Sang Joon An, Seok-Hoo Jeong, Yun-Jung Yang, Yeon-pyo Hong
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(15): 2777.     CrossRef
  • 7,781 View
  • 113 Download
  • Crossref
The Efficacy of Bisphosphonates for Prevention of Osteoporotic Fracture: An Update Meta-analysis
Ji-Hye Byun, Sunmee Jang, Sumin Lee, Suyeon Park, Hyun Koo Yoon, Byung-Ho Yoon, Yong-Chan Ha
J Bone Metab 2017;24(1):37-49.
Published online February 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2017.24.1.37
Background

The efficacy of bisphosphonates for osteoporotic fracture has been consistently reported in recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling hundreds of patients. The objective of this study was to update knowledge on the efficacy of available bisphosphonates in the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures.

Methods

An approach “using systematic reviews” on PubMed and Cochrane Library was taken. Twenty-four RCTs investigating the effects of bisphosphonates for the prevention of osteoporotic fracture were included in final analysis. A pairwise meta-analysis was conducted with a random effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of bisphosphonate.

Results

The use of bisphosphonate decrease the risk of overall osteoporotic fracture (odds ratio [OR] 0.62; P<0.001), vertebral fracture (OR 0.55; P<0.001) and non-vertebral fracture (OR 0.73; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that zoledronic acid showed the lowest risk reduction (OR 0.61; P<0.001) for overall osteoporotic fractures but no significance was observed for etidronate (OR 0.34; P=0.127).

Conclusions

This update meta-analysis re-confirmed that bisphosphonate use can effectively reduce the risk of osteoporotic fracture. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding etidronate for the prevention of osteoporotic fracture.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • 1. Alternative Osteoporosis Therapies After Bisphosphonate Associated Atypical Femur Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis
    Andrew Ni, Azophi Moffat, Jordan Robbins, Dean Slocum, Abhi Rashiwala, Katerina Papanikolaou, Ravi Karia
    Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 2. Medicinal-chemistry-driven strategies for the synthesis of antiosteoclastogenic small molecules targeting RANKL and its downstream signaling pathways
    Abdul Basit, Siyuan Wang
    European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.2026; 308: 118665.     CrossRef
  • 3. Health and adverse events associated with extended oral bisphosphonates among postmenopausal women: a systematic review
    Prawira Oka, Aminath Shiwaza Moosa, Eileen Yi Ling Koh, Chirk Jenn Ng
    The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.2026; 111(5): e1226.     CrossRef
  • 4. Multidimensional Health Evaluation of Older Adults in a Tertiary Care Fragility Fracture Clinic: Insights from a Geriatric Assessment-based Approach
    Baburao Gudeti, Abhijith Rajaram Rao, Aparajit Ballav Dey, Rajesh Malhotra, Avinash Chakrawarty, Prashun Chatterjee
    Journal of the Indian Academy of Geriatrics.2026; 22(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • 5. Proportions of patients meeting definitions for progressive disease or improvement should be included in clinical trials for systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease
    Kathleen Morrisroe, Donald Tashkin, Murray Baron
    Arthritis Research & Therapy.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 6. Approaches to the identification, treatment and management of osteoporosis
    Christopher Waters
    Journal of Prescribing Practice.2026; 8(7): 296.     CrossRef
  • 7. Prescription Medication Use Among Women Aged 40 and Older in the United States from 1999 to 2020
    Claire E. Dunlap, Lauren M. Hurwitz, Jazmine Abril, Adam P. Bress, Rob L. Dood, Oana A. Zeleznik, Britton Trabert
    Journal of Women's Health.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8. Evolving strategies for osteoporosis management in postmenopausal women: From tradition to innovation
    Anum Akbar, Amna Zaheer, Manahil Mansha Kharal, Aqsa Komel, Muhammad Hamza Khan, Areeba Ahsan, Achit Kumar Singh
    Medicine.2025; 104(7): e41605.     CrossRef
  • 9. Fracture Prevention with Infrequent Zoledronate in Women

    New England Journal of Medicine.2025; 392(15): 1554.     CrossRef
  • 10. Bisphosphonate Use in Patients Who Have Osteoporosis Does Not Increase the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Enrico M. Forlenza, Joseph Serino, Alexander J. Acuña, E. Bailey Terhune, Omar A. Behery, Craig J. Della Valle
    The Journal of Arthroplasty.2025; 40(6): 1390.     CrossRef
  • 11. A Narrative Review for Mechanisms and Management of Secondary Vertebral Collapse Following Minimally Invasive Bone Cement Augmentation Procedures for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures
    Bing-Yi Yang, Shao-Kuan Song, Huo-Liang Zheng, Qi-Zhu Chen, Hao Cai, Yong Wang, Muradil Mardan, Lei-Sheng Jiang, Sheng-Dan Jiang
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 12. Nandrolone Decanoate for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Lucas C Camara, Matheus H Ferreira, Nelson C Junior
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 13. Anti-osteoporosis drugs reduce mortality in cancer patients: A national cohort study of elderly with vertebral fractures
    Chun-Feng Huan, Tzu-Tung Kuo, Jason C Hsu, Russell O Kosik, Wing P Chan
    Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.2024; 53(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • 14. Sacroplasty for Sacral Insufficiency Fractures: Narrative Literature Review on Patient Selection, Technical Approaches, and Outcomes
    Manjot Singh, Mariah Balmaceno-Criss, Ashley Knebel, Michael Kuharski, Itala Sakr, Mohammad Daher, Christopher L. McDonald, Bassel G. Diebo, John K. Czerwein, Alan H. Daniels
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(4): 1101.     CrossRef
  • 15. Conditional loss of CaMKK2 in Osterix-positive osteoprogenitors enhances osteoblast function in a sex-divergent manner
    Brett T. Mattingly, Anuradha Valiya Kambrath, Xinchun Ding, William R. Thompson, Uma Sankar
    Bone.2024; 184: 117113.     CrossRef
  • 16. Under-Prescription of Drugs in the Elderly Population of Western Romania: An Analysis Based on STOPP/START Version 2 Criteria
    Petru Baneu, Andreea Prelipcean, Valentina Oana Buda, Narcisa Jianu, Anca Tudor, Minodora Andor, Cristina Merlan, Mirabela Romanescu, Maria Suciu, Simona Buda, Teodora Mateoc, Daniela Gurgus, Liana Dehelean
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(19): 5970.     CrossRef
  • 17. Bisphosphonate effectiveness in patients with cirrhosis: An emulated clinical trial
    Elliot B. Tapper, Beanna Martinez, Peter Jepsen, Xi Chen, Neehar D. Parikh
    Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2024; 60(5): 585.     CrossRef
  • 18. Real-world effectiveness of osteoporosis screening in older Swedish women (SUPERB)
    Michail Zoulakis, Kristian F. Axelsson, Henrik Litsne, Lisa Johansson, Mattias Lorentzon
    Bone.2024; 187: 117204.     CrossRef
  • 19. Risk of Subsequent Hip Fractures across Varying Treatment Patterns for Index Vertebral Compression Fractures
    Andy Ton, Jennifer A. Bell, William J. Karakash, Thomas D. Alter, Mary Kate Erdman, Hyunwoo Paco Kang, Emily S. Mills, Jonathan Mina Ragheb, Mirbahador Athari, Jeffrey C. Wang, Ram K. Alluri, Raymond J. Hah
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(16): 4781.     CrossRef
  • 20. Effectiveness and Safety of Treatments to Prevent Fractures in People With Low Bone Mass or Primary Osteoporosis: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians
    Chelsea Ayers, Devan Kansagara, Brittany Lazur, Rongwei Fu, Amy Kwon, Curtis Harrod
    Annals of Internal Medicine.2023; 176(2): 182.     CrossRef
  • 21. The association between multimorbidity and osteoporosis investigation and treatment in high-risk fracture patients in Australia: A prospective cohort study
    Dana Bliuc, Thach Tran, Weiwen Chen, Dunia Alarkawi, Dima A. Alajlouni, Fiona Blyth, Lyn March, Kristine E. Ensrud, Robert D. Blank, Jacqueline R. Center, Christelle Nguyen
    PLOS Medicine.2023; 20(1): e1004142.     CrossRef
  • 22. An overview of the management of osteoporosis in the aging female population
    Usman Amin, Aoife McPartland, Miriam O’Sullivan, Carmel Silke
    Women's Health.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 23. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic QCT-based osteoporosis screening for the prediction of incident vertebral fractures
    Sebastian Rühling, Julian Schwarting, Matthias F. Froelich, Maximilian T. Löffler, Jannis Bodden, Moritz R. Hernandez Petzsche, Thomas Baum, Maria Wostrack, A. Kaywan Aftahy, Vanadin Seifert-Klauss, Nico Sollmann, Claus Zimmer, Jan S. Kirschke, Fabian Tol
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 24. Exploring the impact of an instructional web-based healthcare app for relieving back pain from spinal compression fractures: an observational study
    Pei-Hung Liao, William Chu
    Multimedia Tools and Applications.2023; 83(11): 33295.     CrossRef
  • 25. Clinicians’ views of prescribing oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a qualitative study
    Simon Bishop, Melanie Jay Narayanasamy, Zoe Paskins, Nadia Corp, Anastasios Bastounis, Jill Griffin, Neil Gittoes, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Tessa Langley, Opinder Sahota
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 26. The Potential Therapeutic Effects of Platelet-Derived Biomaterials on Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review of Current Evidence
    Mohammad Amin Amiri, Nima Farshidfar, Richard J. Miron, Arkadiusz Dziedzic, Shahram Hamedani, Sajad Daneshi, Lobat Tayebi, Weihao Yuan
    International Journal of Biomaterials.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • 27. Comparison of different predicting models to assist the diagnosis of spinal lesions
    William Chu, Chen-Shie Ho, Pei-Hung Liao
    Informatics for Health and Social Care.2022; 47(1): 92.     CrossRef
  • 28. Identifying temporal patterns of adherence to antidepressants, bisphosphonates and statins, and associated patient factors
    Kyu Hyung Park, Leonie Tickle, Henry Cutler
    SSM - Population Health.2022; 17: 100973.     CrossRef
  • 29. Importance of Time Point–Specific Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Osteoporosis Treatments: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analyses
    Damon Willems, Muhammad Kassim Javaid, Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva, Cesar Libanati, Alon Yehoshua, Mata Charokopou
    Clinical Therapeutics.2022; 44(1): 81.     CrossRef
  • 30. Application of Machine Learning in Developing Decision-Making Support Models for Decompressed Vertebroplasty
    Pei-Hung Liao, Yu-Chuan Tsuei, William Chu
    Healthcare.2022; 10(2): 214.     CrossRef
  • 31. Race and Age Impact Osteoporosis Screening Rates in Women Prior to Hip Fracture
    Gregory Benes, Justin David, Molly Synowicz, Alex Betech, Vinod Dasa, Peter C. Krause, Deryk Jones, Lauren Hall, Lauren Leslie, Andrew G. Chapple
    Archives of Osteoporosis.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 32. Comparative efficacy and safety of bisphosphonate therapy for bone loss in individuals after middle age: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Qin Hu, Xun Pan, Yaxian Liang, Hongdan Xu, Jinning Gu, Wenting She, Huixu Xie
    Nano TransMed.2022; 1(1): 9130003.     CrossRef
  • 33. El caso de la osteoporosis
    Alberto López García-Franco, Ana Pereira Iglesias, Anabel González Prats, Elena Cardona Corrochano
    FMC - Formación Médica Continuada en Atención Primaria.2022; 29(4): 209.     CrossRef
  • 34. Analysis of the effects of curcumin and symbiotic consumption on bones of rats submitted to the use of dexamethasone
    Julia Aparecida Galdino Torralba de Oliveira, Mariana Daudt Neves, Gleicy Fernanda Soares Sampaio, Carlos José Leopoldo Constantino, Wilson Romero Nakagaki
    Life Sciences.2022; 304: 120690.     CrossRef
  • 35. Acceptability and engagement amongst patients on oral and intravenous bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis in older adults
    Melanie Narayanasamy, Simon Bishop, Opinder Sahota, Zoe Paskins, Neil Gittoes, Tessa Langley
    Age and Ageing.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 36. A Mini Review on Osteoporosis: From Biology to Pharmacological Management of Bone Loss
    Kok-Yong Chin, Ben Nett Ng, Muhd Khairik Imran Rostam, Nur Farah Dhaniyah Muhammad Fadzil, Vaishnavi Raman, Farzana Mohamed Yunus, Syed Alhafiz Syed Hashim, Sophia Ogechi Ekeuku
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(21): 6434.     CrossRef
  • 37. The Contribution of Multimorbidity to Under-Diagnosis and Under-Treatment of Osteoporosis in High-Risk Fracture Patients
    Dana Bliuc, Thach T. Tran, Weiwen Chen, Dunia Alarkawi, Dima A. Alajlouni, Fiona Blyth, Lyn March, Kristine Ensrud, Robert D. Blank, Jacqueline R. Center
    SSRN Electronic Journal .2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 38. The effect of exercise intensity on bone in postmenopausal women (part 1): A systematic review
    Melanie Kistler-Fischbacher, Benjamin K. Weeks, Belinda R. Beck
    Bone.2021; 143: 115696.     CrossRef
  • 39. Pharmacological Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: a Level I Evidence Based - Expert Opinion
    Filippo Migliorini, Giorgia Colarossi, Alice Baroncini, Jörg Eschweiler, Markus Tingart, Nicola Maffulli
    Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology.2021; 14(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • 40. The impact of bisphosphonates on postoperative complication rates in osteoporotic patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion
    Sidney Roberts, Blake Formanek, Zorica Buser, Jeffrey C. Wang
    European Spine Journal.2021; 30(5): 1329.     CrossRef
  • 41. Efficacy of annual zoledronic acid in initial percutaneous kyphoplasty patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a 3-year follow-up study
    K. Lu, Y. Yin, C. Li, Y. Jin, H.-q. Shan
    Osteoporosis International.2021; 32(7): 1429.     CrossRef
  • 42. Risks, Benefits, and Treatment Modalities of Menopausal Hormone Therapy: Current Concepts
    Jaya Mehta, Juliana M. Kling, JoAnn E. Manson
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 43. Optimal Dosing Regimen of Osteoporosis Drugs in Relation to Food Intake as the Key for the Enhancement of the Treatment Effectiveness—A Concise Literature Review
    Agnieszka Wiesner, Mariusz Szuta, Agnieszka Galanty, Paweł Paśko
    Foods.2021; 10(4): 720.     CrossRef
  • 44. Cancer Treatment–Induced Bone Loss (CTIBL): State of the Art and Proper Management in Breast Cancer Patients on Endocrine Therapy
    Anna Diana, Francesca Carlino, Emilio Francesco Giunta, Elisena Franzese, Luigi Pio Guerrera, Vincenzo Di Lauro, Fortunato Ciardiello, Bruno Daniele, Michele Orditura
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 45. The Impact of COVID-19 on the Optimal Management of Osteoporosis
    Sung Hye Kong, Bo Kwon Hwang, Byung-Ho Yoon
    Journal of Bone Metabolism.2021; 28(2): 115.     CrossRef
  • 46. Zoledronic Acid in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Treated With Percutaneous Kyphoplasty: A Meta-Analysis
    Peng Tian, Yue Liu, Zhi-jun Li, Gui-jun Xu, Xin-long Ma
    Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 47. Fragility Fractures: Risk Factors and Management in the Elderly
    Filippo Migliorini, Riccardo Giorgino, Frank Hildebrand, Filippo Spiezia, Giuseppe Maria Peretti, Mario Alessandri-Bonetti, Jörg Eschweiler, Nicola Maffulli
    Medicina.2021; 57(10): 1119.     CrossRef
  • 48. Effect of different hydration doses on renal function in patients with primary osteoporosis treated with zoledronic acid
    Xin Dai, Yongtao Deng, Yetao Luo, Jianghong Xie, Houxun Ma
    Medicine.2020; 99(25): e20831.     CrossRef
  • 49. The Belgian Bone Club 2020 guidelines for the management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
    D. Sanchez-Rodriguez, P. Bergmann, J.J. Body, E. Cavalier, E. Gielen, S. Goemaere, B. Lapauw, MR Laurent, S. Rozenberg, G. Honvo, C. Beaudart, O. Bruyère
    Maturitas.2020; 139: 69.     CrossRef
  • 50. Effect of bisphosphonates or teriparatide on mechanical complications after posterior instrumented fusion for osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a multi-center retrospective study
    Atsuyuki Kawabata, Toshitaka Yoshii, Takashi Hirai, Shuta Ushio, Takashi Kaito, Tomoya Yamashita, Hiroyasu Fujiwara, Yukitaka Nagamoto, Yuji Matsuoka, Hidekazu Suzuki, Hirosuke Nishimura, Hidetomi Terai, Koji Tamai, Atsushi Tagami, Syuta Yamada, Shinji Ad
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 51. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an integrated osteoporosis care programme for postmenopausal women in Flanders: study protocol of a quasi-experimental controlled design
    Caroline Verdonck, Lieven Annemans, Stefan Goemaere, Bruno Lapauw, Geert Goderis, Elie Balligand, Marie-Paule Doom, Stany Perkisas, Liesbeth Borgermans
    Archives of Osteoporosis.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 52. Bisphosphonate therapy in CKD
    Matthew J. Damasiewicz, Thomas L. Nickolas
    Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension.2020; 29(2): 221.     CrossRef
  • 53. Duration of Bisphosphonate Drug Holidays and Associated Fracture Risk
    Jeffrey R. Curtis, Kenneth G. Saag, Tarun Arora, Nicole C. Wright, Huifeng Yun, Shanette Daigle, Robert Matthews, Elizabeth Delzell
    Medical Care.2020; 58(5): 419.     CrossRef
  • 54. Efficacy and safety of denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women previously treated with oral bisphosphonates
    P.D. Miller, N. Pannacciulli, J. Malouf-Sierra, A. Singer, E. Czerwiński, H.G. Bone, C. Wang, S. Huang, A. Chines, W. Lems, J.P. Brown
    Osteoporosis International.2020; 31(1): 181.     CrossRef
  • 55. Differences in the microarchitectural features of the lateral collapsed lesion between osteonecrosis and subchondral insufficiency fracture of the femoral head
    Koichiro Kawano, Goro Motomura, Satoshi Ikemura, Ryosuke Yamaguchi, Shoji Baba, Mingjian Xu, Yasuharu Nakashima
    Bone.2020; 141: 115585.     CrossRef
  • 56. Three-Component Reaction of Diamines with Triethyl Orthoformate and Diethyl Phosphite and Anti-Proliferative and Antiosteoporotic Activities of the Products
    Patrycja Petruczynik, Paweł Kafarski, Mateusz Psurski, Joanna Wietrzyk, Zdzisław Kiełbowicz, Jan Kuryszko, Ewa Chmielewska
    Molecules.2020; 25(6): 1424.     CrossRef
  • 57. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: definition and best practice for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment
    Ourania Nicolatou-Galitis, Morten Schiødt, Rui Amaral Mendes, Carla Ripamonti, Sally Hope, Lawrence Drudge-Coates, Daniela Niepel, Tim Van den Wyngaert
    Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology.2019; 127(2): 117.     CrossRef
  • 58. Bisphosphonate treatment changes regional distribution of trabecular microstructure in human lumbar vertebrae
    Annika vom Scheidt, Haniyeh Hemmatian, Klaus Püschel, Matthias Krause, Michael Amling, Björn Busse
    Bone.2019; 127: 482.     CrossRef
  • 59. Bisphosphonates for Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Fractures: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lei Shi, Nan Min, Fei Wang, Qing-Yun Xue
    BioMed Research International.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • 60. Bisphosphonates and cardiovascular risk in elderly patients with previous cardiovascular disease: a population-based nested case-control study in Italy
    Ursula Kirchmayer, Chiara Sorge, Janet Sultana, Francesco Lapi, Graziano Onder, Nera Agabiti, Silvia Cascini, Giuseppe Roberto, Giovanni Corrao, Cristiana Vitale, Ersilia Lucenteforte, Alessandro Mugelli, Marina Davoli, C. Bartolini, R. Bernabei, A Bettio
    Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 61. Microcirculatory consequences of limb ischemia/reperfusion in ovariectomized rats treated with zoledronic acid
    Levente Pócs, Ágnes Janovszky, Imre Ocsovszki, József Kaszaki, József Piffkó, Andrea Szabó
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 62. Prolonged Effect of Zoledronic Acid on Bone Mineral Density and Turnover in HIV-Infected Adults on Tenofovir: A Randomized, Open-Label Study
    Andrew Carr, Stephen J Kerr, Robyn Richardson, Peter Ebeling, Nicholas Pocock, Jhon Rojas, Esteban Martinez, Jennifer Hoy
    Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.2019; 34(12): 2192.     CrossRef
  • 63. Efficacy, cost, and aspects to take into account in the treatment of osteoporosis in the elderly
    Pilar Sáez-López, Iñigo Etxebarria-Foronda, Maria Pilar Mesa Lampre, Noelia Alonso García, Natalia Sánchez Hernández
    Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.2019; 54(3): 156.     CrossRef
  • 64. Zoledronate Triggers Vδ2 T Cells to Destroy and Kill Spheroids of Colon Carcinoma: Quantitative Image Analysis of Three-Dimensional Cultures
    Serena Varesano, Maria Raffaella Zocchi, Alessandro Poggi
    Frontiers in Immunology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 65. Screening for osteoporosis: A systematic assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines, using the AGREE II instrument and the IOM Standards for Trustworthy Guidelines
    Lamia M. Hayawi, Ian D. Graham, Peter Tugwell, Said Yousef Abdelrazeq, Bart O. Williams
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(12): e0208251.     CrossRef
  • 66. Sobrediagnóstico en la salud de la mujer: el caso de la osteoporosis
    Elena Cardona Corrochano, Ana Pereira Iglesias, David Fraile Navarro, Alberto López García Franco
    Atención Primaria.2018; 50: 30.     CrossRef
  • 67. Hip fracture risk in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis: A population-based study using English and Danish data
    Harmony Otete, Thomas Deleuran, Kate M. Fleming, Tim Card, Guru P. Aithal, Peter Jepsen, Joe West
    Journal of Hepatology.2018; 69(3): 697.     CrossRef
  • 68. The role of biphosphonates in the management of thalassemia-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Athanasios N. Tsartsalis, George I. Lambrou, Dimitrios Tsartsalis, Christos Savvidis, Maria Karantza, Evangelos Terpos, Christina Kanaka-Gantenbein, George P. Chrousos, Antonis Kattamis
    Hormones.2018; 17(2): 153.     CrossRef
  • 69. The underlying pathophysiology and therapeutic approaches for osteoporosis
    Harshika Awasthi, Dayanandan Mani, Divya Singh, Atul Gupta
    Medicinal Research Reviews.2018; 38(6): 2024.     CrossRef
  • 70. Targeting therapeutics to bone by conjugation with bisphosphonates
    Robert N Young, Marc D Grynpas
    Current Opinion in Pharmacology.2018; 40: 87.     CrossRef
  • 71. The bone remodelling cycle
    JS Kenkre, JHD Bassett
    Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine.2018; 55(3): 308.     CrossRef
  • 72. Clinical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures
    Adam Z. Khan, Richard D. Rames, Anna N. Miller
    Current Osteoporosis Reports.2018; 16(3): 299.     CrossRef
  • 73. Can Bisphosphonates Prevent Recurrent Fragility Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sang Yoon Lee, Se Hee Jung, Shi-Uk Lee, Yong-Chan Ha, Jae-Young Lim
    Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.2018; 19(5): 384.     CrossRef
  • 6,200 View
  • 48 Download
  • Crossref